Fall of big-named cricketer may 'help' stamp out corruption: Ian Chappell
Ian Chappell on what could stop the mess caused by spot fixing
There was a time when cricket looked upon T20 as a saviour. However, following revelations of another major corruption scandal in the lavish spending IPL, officials must now be wondering about the wisdom of opening up more fixing avenues to the crooks.
Early indications suggest the current investigation will be far reaching with even more players dragged into the net. It’ll be interesting to see if some of the cricketers crack and start helping with the investigations by implicating others. This is an area where previous corruption scandals haven’t revealed much but sooner or later players need to become a source of useful information.
For this to happen the players will require some guarantees in order to be rid of their fear of the consequences of being a whistle blower. This is an awfully large obstacle to overcome.
In a perverse way, cricket’s best weapon in the fight against corruption might be the revelation that a really big name player was involved in a scam. That way the outcry would be so widespread as to galvanise all parties into action against the crooks. When I first heard the news of the latest scandal I wasn’t shocked; there’s so much information available it’s hard not to believe in the theory “where there’s smoke there’s fire”.
However, I was staggered that the bastardry occurred on Rahul Dravid’s watch. Such is the widespread respect for the Royals captain, not just his achievements but also his integrity, it’s hard to imagine a player giving anything less than 100% for such a man.
The fact that players under Dravid’s captaincy indulged in alleged spot fixing highlights the magnitude of the problem cricket is facing. In a game that has suffered previously because the captain was directly involved in the corruption, this is one time when you can be sure – as certain as is possible in such a dirty business — the skipper was blameless. Worryingly, once again cricket and in particular the Anti-Corruption and Security Unit (ACSU), also appear to be unblemished.
Apparently they took no part in the current investigations and despite a number of arrests and convictions over the years, the game has had very little success in bringing to book any of the villains. I’m not surprised at this lack of success following an exchange with a member of the ACSU in 2010, which culminated in me responding; “Don’t you understand how the corruption works? It’s not the players who decide when and where the fraud occurs.”
It’s frightening to think the ACSU may not fully grasp the fact that once the crooks get their hooks into a player he has only one way out – the same way you exit the mafia.
The game needs a cricket solution to corruption along with a legal one. If cricket relies solely on proving the guilt of these miscreants in a law court the problem will never be eradicated and eventually the game will lose all credibility. The ACSU, with the backing of the officials, has to be more proactive. They need to rattle a few cages and occasionally ignore the Marquis of Queensbury rule book. When they’re convinced their suspicions about a person are valid, they should then demand cricket plays it’s part and wield the axe at the selection table. If offenders are permanently omitted it’s difficult for the lawyers to wage war on the basis of non-selection.
This may sound draconian and drastic but that’s the only way cricket is going to win this dirty war. The heavy lifting can’t always be left to Indian police investigations, or television and newspapers to produce undercover stings.
If cricket doesn’t earnestly engage in this battle they’ll find themselves in an even bigger fix. Any future fixes may not be right royal ones like this latest scam but too many more and they won’t need to be of that magnitude to tarnish cricket’s reputation drastically.