Man fined Rs 200 for molesting 16-yr-old

28-year-old walks away after paying a meagre penalty for behaving indecently with a 16-year-old girl, on the Nagpur-Mumbai Duronto Express

Man fined Rs 200 for molesting 16-yr-old

28-year-old walks away after paying a meagre penalty for behaving indecently with a 16-year-old girl, on the Nagpur-Mumbai Duronto Express

A 28-year-old software engineer was made to spend a few hours in the railway lock-up for molesting a 16-year-old in the wee hours aboard the Nagpur-Mumbai Duronto Express on September 7.

Prasad Chande, a Bhandup resident, was booked for indecent behaviour by the Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus police for behaving indecently with Sujata Gaikwad (name changed) in the train at Igatpuri, while she was fast asleep. Gaikwad was travelling from Nagpur to Mumbai with her mother to meet some relatives. The duo could only get the reservation for one side berth and they were sharing it. Chande's berth was above and opposite theirs.

Caught in the crude act: In the wee hours of Sept 7,u00a0 28-year-old Prasad
Chande feels up 16-yr-old Sujata as she is sleeping on her shared berth.
Drowsy, she ignores and brushes off the touch, thinking it is an insect

Cruel intentions: But Chande continues his indecent pursuit, putting his
middle finger in Sujata's mouth. This is when she jolts out of her sleep,
shocked, and bites on the man's finger

Booked: Sujata's mother wakes up, grabs a fleeing Chande, and holds
on to him until the next morning, to take him to the CST police station,
where he is booked with charges of indecent behaviour.

Said Sujata, "I was fast asleep with my mother. Between 2 am and 3 am, I felt something moving over my dress. I realised that Chande was trying to touch me. He had been trying to do that for quite some time while getting off and on his berth. He even tried putting his hand inside my clothes. Shocked and scared, I moved a little. But when he tried to put his middle finger in my mouth, I gathered the courage to bite his finger. Angry with his indecent behaviour, I then slapped him."u00a0u00a0u00a0

Sujata's mother said, "I asked the man not to leave the train, but he started running away. I chased him to the next compartment, dragged him back to our seats and did not let go of him. He begged me not to register a police complaint, saying that he was going to get married. But I was appalled that someone going to be married can indulge in such indecency."

She added, "Upon reaching CST the next morning, the police told us that an FIR against him would require us to come down to Mumbai several times. So we asked them to charge and fine him, so he would not repeat the act again."

According to police officials, a non-cognisable offence was registered against Chande at the CST police station.
Chande was booked under LAC (Local Act Charges) Sections 110 and 117 for indecent behaviour. He was taken to railway court number 35 where he was fined Rs 200 and sent to police custody for a few hours.

Ashok Jadhav, senior police inspector, said, "The girl and her mother came to us, complaining against the indecent behaviour of the man, after which we booked him under LAC Act and sent him to the railway court where he was fined."

The other side
Accused Prasad Chande said, "I didn't do much with the girl. She was sleeping with her mother on one berth. As I was taking my shoes off from below her berth my hand touched her body unintentionally. I admit that I touched her intentionally the second time, as I was attracted to her. But she bit my finger. I regret what I did. I have faced the punishment meted out by the police and the court for my act."

Penalties
>>u00a0In cases where the accused molests or insults the modesty of a woman by way of obscene acts or by means of words, gesture, or acts that are intended to insult the modesty and dignity of a woman, he shall be punished under the following sections.

>>u00a0Under Section 294 the obscene act must cause annoyance. The annoyance should be done in a public place and cause mental harassment. A person shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term, which may extend to three months, or with fine, or with both.

>>u00a0Section 509 of IPC, comes into effect when there is an intention to insult the modesty of any woman by the offender by uttering any word, making any sound or gesture or by exhibiting any object, with the intention that such word or such sound be heard, or that such gesture or object be seen by such a woman, or by intruding upon the privacy of such a woman. The punishment can be simple imprisonment for a year, or fine, or both.

>>u00a0Section 354 of IPC intensifies the punishment up to three years, if the guilty has touched the victim's body.

>>u00a0Under the local charges, the guilty are sent to the railway court and fined up to Rs 1,200.u00a0