Activist Praveen Wategaonkar has accused Pawar of conniving with officials in irregular award of contracts for projects, causing losses to the public exchequer.
Pawar, who was state's water resource minister between 1999 and 2009, had resigned last year following media reportsabout alleged irregularities to the tune of Rs 20,000 crore in irrigation projects.
He was later reinstated after a government White Paper gave him a clean chit. In the affidavit, Wategaonkar has alleged that the procedures adopted in regard to Jamda and Balganga projects of Konkan Irrigation Development Corporation indicate that sanctioning of contractor claims, award of contracts and cost escalations were vitiated due to arbitrariness, nepotism, malafides, causing loss to the exchequer.
He said the then WRD Minister appeared to be complicit along with erstwhile Konkan Irrigation Development Corporation (KIDC) Officials and Contractor M/s F. A. Constructions. "This needs to be enquired into and FIR should be filed against Minister Ajit Pawar, erstwhile KIDC Officials and the contractor for entering into conspiracy and corruption under the Prevention of corruption Act", said Wategaonkar in the affidavit filed yesterday.
The case is slated to come up for hearing before a division bench on August 5. The affidavit said that as per information available, Jamda contract was initially awarded to M/s F.A constructions for Rs 75 crores to which additional work quantities (of twice the original price), taking the total contract value to Rs 233 crore.
"This deprived other bidders the chance to bid or offer a more competitive price for the bundled/bigger work quantities, resulting in loss to exchequer and contrary to public interest," the affidavit alleged.
In case of Gadnadi project, it said, the Dam construction contract was initially awarded to M/s F.A Constructions for Rs 50 crore to which additional work quantities of Rs 219 crores (four times the original price) were later added, thereby depriving other bidders the chance to bid or offer a more competitive price for the bigger work quantities, resulting in loss to exchequer.