Special Feature: How Nicolaus Copernicus revolutionised astronomy

On the 542nd birth anniversary of mathematician and astronomer, Nicolaus Copernicus, we look back at his greatest contribution, the theory of heliocentrism, in which he formulated a model of the universe that placed the Sun rather than the Earth at its center.

 Nicolaus Copernicus
Nicolaus Copernicus

Copernicus' theory triggered the Copernican Revolution and made an important contribution to the Scientific Revolution. He wrote a 'Commentariolus' or 'Little Commentary', outlining his theory for his friends. It was a forty-page manuscript describing his heliocentric hypothesis containing seven basic assumptions, namely...

1. Celestial bodies do not all revolve around a single point
2. The centre of Earth is the centre of the lunar sphere—the orbit of the moon around Earth
3. All the spheres rotate around the Sun, which is near the centre of the Universe
4. The distance between Earth and the Sun is an insignificant fraction of the distance from Earth and Sun to the stars, so parallax is not observed in the stars
5. The stars are immovable; their apparent daily motion is caused by the daily rotation of Earth
6. Earth is moved in a sphere around the Sun, causing the apparent annual migration of the Sun; Earth has more than one motion
7. Earth’s orbital motion around the Sun causes the seeming reverse in direction of the motions of the planets.

 Solar System
The solar system

The above assumptions were later elaborated in Nicolas Copernicus' major theory, De revolutionibus orbium coelestium (On the Revolutions of the Celestial Spheres), which was published in 1543, the year of his death.

1. The book itself was further divded into six parts...
2. General vision of the heliocentric theory, and a summarized exposition of his idea of the World
3. Mainly theoretical, presents the principles of spherical astronomy and a list of stars (as a basis for the arguments developed in the subsequent books)
4. Mainly dedicated to the apparent motions of the Sun and to related phenomena
5. Description of the Moon and its orbital motions
6. Exposition of the motions in longitude of the non-terrestrial planets
7. Exposition of the motions in latitude of the non-terrestrial planets

Copernicus' theory of heliocentrism was slow to catch on initially since Aristotelian philosophy and Ptolemaic astronomy still dominated the intellectual climate of the time. Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe competed with Copernicus' heliocentric system with a theory of his own. It was Brahe's belief that the earth is stationary, the sun revolves about the earth, and the other planets revolve about the sun.

A diagram representing Copernicus' theory of heliocentrism
A diagram representing Copernicus' theory of heliocentrism

It was only a half century later with the work of Johannes Kepler and Galileo Galilei that any substantial evidence defending Copernicanism appeared. Galileo formulated the principle of inertia, which helped to explain why everything would not fall off the earth if it were in motion. The heliocentric view generally accepted after the publication of Isaac Newton's Principia in 1687, which formulated the universal law of gravitation and the laws of mechanics, thus unifying terrestrial and celestial mechanics.

Did you know?
>> Nicolaus Copernicus derived a quantity theory of money – a key concept in economics in 1517
>> Copernicus formulated a version of what later became known as Gresham's law in 1519.
>> The chemical element 112, discovered on 14 July 2009, which was temporarily named ununbium, was given the name copernicium in honour of Nicolaus Copernicus. The official naming was released to the general public on his 537th birth anniversary
>> Apart from his knowledge in astronomy, Nicolaus Copernicus was fluent in several languages which included Latin, German, Polish, Greek and Italian.
>> During his lifetime, Copernicus had a doctorate in canon law and also practising as a physician, classics scholar, translator, governor, diplomat and economist.

You May Like



    Leave a Reply