Terry's defence not credible, says FA-appointed panel

John Terry's defence that he had not racially insulted QPR defender Anton Ferdinand was "improbable, implausible and contrived", according to the commission who banned the Chelsea skipper for four matches.


London
PA Sport

The independent Football Association regulatory commission said there was “no credible basis” for Terry’s claim he had only been repeating words he thought Ferdinand had accused him of saying.

In their full written reasons for the four-match ban, the commission said they were satisfied the words “f***ing black c***” were intended as an insult by Terry.

He now has two weeks in which to appeal. The commission also stated: “There are further aspects of Mr Terry’s defence that the commission finds improbable, implausible and contrived, and which serve to underline and reinforce our decision.

“The commission is quite satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that there is no credible basis for Mr Terry’s defence that his use of the words ‘f****** black c***’ were directed at Mr Ferdinand by way of forceful rejection and/or inquiry.

“Instead, we are quite satisfied, and find on the balance of probabilities, that the offending words were said by way of insult.” — PA SportĀ 

Post your views on the story - via your Facebook profile or using the comment box below

comments powered by Disqus

Get Updates from Mid-Day.com


Copyright @ 2011 Mid-day Infomedia Ltd. All rights reserverd.