Face veil ban must be seen in its correct context
A section of people have stated that banning the burqa will not stop terrorism. That is not the point. The face covering ban is to ensure recognition
The burqa ban debate has started sizzling in the country. The immediate trigger for this is Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut's recent editorial in the Shiv Sena mouthpiece Saamna. Raut said Sri Lanka has banned face coverings and it was time for India to follow suit. Raut said this was driven primarily by security concerns.
Now, a Kerala Muslim education group head has been threatened because he has cited in a circular that women students should not cover their faces. It is time to look at the burqa ban for what it is, it is a ban on face coverings, and in fact all camouflages for the visage in public places. Muslim women who wear the niqab (face veil) will fall under the ambit of this ban. Several countries in Europe have banned the face veil.
A section of people have stated that banning the burqa will not stop terrorism. That is not the point. The face covering ban is to ensure recognition. When a person is allowed to conceal their face, it makes identification difficult in case a crime has occurred.
The Muslim community and others have to see the ban through the proper prism. It has been enforced in certain countries because of security. It is not about targeting individuals or a community, do not fall prey to politicians screeching from pulpits with their attempts to polarise. There is no harm in having a debate. Conversations open minds.
We need to have the intellectual courage to ask the uncomfortable question. We need to have a conversation that can get some squirming, riled or outraged. You may not agree but you can allow and encourage the Socratic gadfly mindset. The same people who shout about the current political dispensation shutting down dissent or free speech cannot shut down this debate themselves.
Raj Thackeray can't believe election result!