Focus on sensitive development without overpowering heritage, says conservation architect

Apr 22, 2015, 07:15 IST | Fiona Fernandez

Conservation architect Vikas Dilawari speaks to Fiona Fernandez on how the BMC can change its recently scrapped development plan to better protect Mumbai’s heritage, by mapping all historical structures and giving the Heritage Committee full control

The BMC’s development plan (DP) for 1991 was hailed throughout the country for introducing heritage legislation. Ironically, this legacy could have been wiped out by the proposed DP 2034, had it not been scrapped by the state government yesterday.

According to conservation architect Vikas Dilawari, the scrapped DP proposal could have wiped out the previous DP’s legacy of heritage protection. Pic/Sayed Sameer Abedi
According to conservation architect Vikas Dilawari, the scrapped DP proposal could have wiped out the previous DP’s legacy of heritage protection. Pic/Sayed Sameer Abedi

With not even a separate chapter dedicated to heritage and conservation, the cancelled proposal played down on the city’s rich history, and worse, sought to destroy it with shocking omissions and road widening plans.

Serious flaws
Heritage areas do not cover more than 7.5 per cent (approximate) of the city, but this 7.5 per cent commands high commercial value, and, hence, is considered a major hindrance or liability by planners.

Mumbai is fortunate to have retained its historic buildings by enabling legislation first introduced in 1995. With the passage of time, however, rules were tweaked and Grade III cess buildings (residential structures which were tenanted before the 1940s) and heritage precincts were removed from the Heritage Committee’s purview.

Going beyond this, the scrapped DP 2034 had recommended removal of Grade I and Grade III precincts and buildings from the Mumbai Heritage Conservation Committee’s (MHCC) purview, leaving only Grade II buildings in its fold.

This would have meant that previously listed and mapped buildings could have been redeveloped as per generic development laws as high-rises with podium parking, for instance, which would have eroded the city’s planning and pattern, and its unique architectural heritage character.

Road widening
The proposed road-widening plans would have resulted in the demolition of most historic building façades that have existed for more than a century and give our city a unique identity (see box). It would have resulted in the removal of full-grown trees, thereby causing major hazards to the meagre green cover existing in the city.

Vikas Dilawari is a practising conservation architect in Mumbai, with a double Masters in Conservation. Several of his projects have won the UNESCO Asia Pacific Awards. He is a trustee of Indian Heritage Cities Network (IHCN) and co-convener of INTACH Mumbai Chapter.

Five-point plan
1) The BMC must get the entire heritage list mapped on the DP 2034 or add a clause stating that all buildings, which are notified and gazetted shall be considered as heritage buildings and precincts. 

2) Grade III and Grade I buildings must be brought back to the purview of MHCC.

3) Focus on sensitive development without overpowering the original heritage structures. 

4) The government should also allow residents to choose whether they prefer redevelopment or repairs, and provide incentives such as financial support to repair buildings. This will avoid collapses as was seen in a relatively recently constructed building (Altaf Manzil) in Mahim. 

5) Revamping the Repair Board for heritage properties and ensuring quicker repair permissions from the MHCC.

Road kill
Some of the significant heritage buildings and façades that would have been affected if the DP’s road-widening plans were implemented:
>> Institute of Science
>> National Gallery of Modern Art 
>> Metro Cinema
>> Cowasji Jehangir Hall
>> Jer Mahal 
>> Wilson College
>> Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan 
>> Gloria Church
>> Masina Hospital

Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus (CST) was designated as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2004, but this was not shown in the DP. Shockingly, the proposal also neglected to map many important heritage sites:
>> St Thomas Cathedral
>> Town Hall
>> Old Custom House
>> Old Writers House
>> Bombay Castle 
>> Elphinstone Building
>> Watson Hotel
>> Army and Navy Building 
>> Oval Maidan
>> Elphinstone College 
>> Keneseth Eliyahoo Synagogue
>> Wellington Fountain
>> Maharashtra State Police Head Quarters (Royal Alfred Sailors Home)

DISCLAIMER: mid-day and its affiliates shall have no liability for any views, thoughts and comments expressed on this article.

Mumbai Crime: Man kills model after sex, stuffs body in suitcase

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK