A decision to enforce a code of conduct ahead of the September 8 elections at the Royal Western India Turf Club has proved to be a bitter brew to swallow for several members
Royal Western India Turf Club
A state government diktat barring candidates for two crucial committees at the Mahalaxmi Race Course from wining and dining potential voters has left a bad taste in the mouth of several members of the Royal Western India Turf Club (RWITC).
Also Read: RWITC fights to reclaim prime land from 'encroacher'
ADVERTISEMENT
File pic for representation
The Maharashtra government's decision to impose a strict Model Code of Conduct for elections to the Managing Committee and Board of Appeals of the elite SoBo club — slated to be held on September 8 — has been challenged by the members, who have protested against it to the chief minister, who heads the home department. Their contention is that the state government has no business interfering with the workings of the RWITC.
Some members, however, have also welcomed the move, claiming that it will put an end to the use of political patronage in the elections.
Do it right: The elections must be conducted, the conduct manual states, with ‘integrity, honour and dignity, both within and outside the race course as the RWITC is a reputed body whose membership is coveted by privileged persons.’ FILE PIC FOR REPRESENTATION
Strict rules
The elections must be conducted, the conduct manual states, with "integrity, honour and dignity, both within and outside the race course as the RWITC is a reputed body whose membership is coveted by privileged persons." The stringent guidelines include the formulation of an Election Committee, constituting police officers and officials of the state home department, to monitor the elections, and terminate candidature upon violation of rules. The code of conduct is supposed to kick in 45 days prior to the elections.
Read Story: 'Heliport can cause serious accidents at Mahalaxmi Race Course'
The code mandates that no person, or his/her relatives, standing for elections to the two committees shall offer free drinks, cocktail, dinner, refreshment, meal at the office or on the premises of RWITC. Also, hosting a cocktail party with the intent of inducing a vote/voter, or arranging parties or functions or giving gifts or donations during the period should be strictly considered as a violation of the code of conduct, the circular says.
Another condition is that no candidate shall exceed the expense limit of R50,000 and can only communicate with voters over emails. "This code applies to all members, contesting candidates and their relatives, and if they are found in default, (they) shall be disqualified with immediate effect," read the conduct rules.
Split wide open
Senior home department officials told mid-day that the RWITC has now written a letter to the chief minister demanding the conduct rules be waived with immediate effect. "Their contention is that the government has no business interfering with the business of the RWITC management and elections. We have asked the chief minister to take a call if there is a need to apply the code this year or not," said a senior government official.
The current RWITC committee, headed by chairman, Khushroo Dhunjibhoy has sent a letter to the government objecting to the Code of Conduct. Says Dhunjibhoy, "Yes, we have sent an objection letter because there are certain conditions in the code which are impossible to fulfil. For example, the clause of holding no parties 45 days before the elections. When the letter reached us, the period had already begun. So, certain parties were already planned and a few have been cancelled."
Dhunjibhoy's main grouse, though, is that a member of the managing committee, Vivek Jain, allegedly asked the government to impose a Code of Conduct and it was done. "So, it was done because one person raised the issue. I think the entire committee should have been consulted, and then the government could have taken a call. Instead, Jain went and lobbied the government. How can that be possible?"
Dhunjibhoy stated that they were not categorically 'against' the Code of Conduct and were happy to follow "certain aspects". "But, the government should have sat in consultation with the entire committee and then, of course, the final call would be that of the government," he said.
'Desirable'
Jain, though, hit back, saying, "The team led by Dhunjibhoy has never been in favour of having a code of conduct, whereas the desirability of having it for any premium organisation is obvious. I was rebuffed at several committee meetings this year when I suggested it should be followed by us, even if on a voluntary basis, but it was rejected by a 5-4 majority. Hence if he says that he is not against the code, the fact is otherwise, as the minutes of the committee will establish."
Mumbai racecourse drama: Anya Shroff vetoed out of club membership
"Why the Government imposed the Code, and whether it was right, is best answered by our licensors. Thankfully, I have no business interest in Maharashtra and neither am I close to any politician or bureaucrat that makes it possible for me to influence their decisions, unlike some of the Chairman's close friends and partners who have used their political patronage unashamedly in the past for personal benefit. Is the kettle calling the pot black?" he added.
"The government imposes several conditions in the licence to race and has never consulted the Committee on it. Why is Dhunjibhoy making such a hue-and-cry over simply adopting practices that are followed by all well-known Clubs and is the norm virtually at every election in the country? The answer is quite obvious. His overriding objection is not about who lobbied for it or not, but that he, and virtually all the people on his team are most uncomfortable with this imposition on them," said Jain.
Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!
