Manchester City's blatant foul

Updated: 30 July, 2020 08:31 IST | AFP | London

CAS reveals Manchester club openly disregarded UEFA investigation, but did not breach FFP rules

Man City's Raheem Sterling (left) during an EPL match against Norwich City recently. Pic/Getty Images
Man City's Raheem Sterling (left) during an EPL match against Norwich City recently. Pic/Getty Images

Manchester City showed a blatant disregard for UEFA's investigation into alleged Financial Fair Play (FFP) breaches, according to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), but European football's governing body failed to prove City had disguised funding from the club's owners as sponsorship income. Earlier this month, CAS overturned a two-year ban from European competitions imposed on City by UEFA and reduced a fine of 30 million euros (R264 cr) to 10 million euros (R88 cr) .

Severe breach

The full judgement by CAS released on Tuesday showed that the fine was to reflect a severe breach in City's unwillingness to cooperate with UEFA's investigation. But that the charges of alleged concealment of equity funding were more significant violations and that "based on the evidence the panel cannot reach the conclusion that disguised funding was paid to City." The club were accused of deliberately inflating the value of income from sponsors to meet UEFA's FFP regulations, which limits the losses clubs can make to spend on player transfer fees and wages.

UEFA launched an investigation after German magazine Der Spiegel published a series of leaked emails relating to City's finances in 2018. CAS indicated that witness statements from senior City executives as well as a letter from owner Sheikh Mansour—all provided to CAS but not to UEFA—could have swung the original verdict in City's favour.

Right decision

"The appealed decision is therefore not per se wrong but, at least to a certain extent, is a consequence of MCFC's decision to produce the most relevant evidence at its disposal only in the present appeal proceedings before CAS," said the court. The judgement also found that UEFA's case was hamstrung by the necessity to finalise the appeal before the start of the 2020-21 Champions League as it relinquished a request for more evidence to be provided from City's emails.

"UEFA's approach in this regard is understood, because it was faced with a dilemma between trying to obtain additional evidence and having an award issued before the start of the 2020-21 UEFA club competitions season," added the CAS panel. Nine EPL clubs—Arsenal, Burnley, Chelsea, Leicester, Liverpool, Man United, Newcastle, Tottenham and Wolves—filed an application to UEFA for City not to be allowed to compete in European competition if a verdict was not reached before the start of the 2020-21 season.

Catch up on all the latest sports news and updates here. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates.

Mid-Day is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@middayinfomedialtd) and stay updated with the latest news

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever

First Published: 30 July, 2020 07:08 IST

Sign up for all the latest news, top galleries and trending videos from Mid-day.com

Subscribe
loading image
This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK