Who Gets to Define Yoga? The Growing Power Imbalance Between India’s Living Traditions and Western Gatekeepers

Yoga is one of Indiarsquos most profound and influential contributions to the worldbut as its global popularity continues to grow a critical question demands attention who now defines yoga certifies its teachers and judges the institutions that have preserved it for centuriesAcross continents yoga is embraced as a universal practiceone that transcends religion nationality and culture It is taught in studios schools retreats and wellness centres from New York to Nairobi Millions benefit from its physical mental and spiritual dimensions This global acceptance is in many ways a remarkable success storyYet beneath this success lies a growing imbalance While the world readily adopts yogarsquos techniques language and commercial potential Indian teachers lineages and institutionsthe very custodians of this traditionare often subjected to heightened scrutiny skepticism and at times swift judgmentWhen controversies arise involving Indian yoga organisations allegations can spread rapidly across digital platforms Social media posts online forums and influencer commentary can amplify claims before they are independently verified or before the institutions involved have had a meaningful opportunity to respond While every allegation deserves to be taken seriously scrutiny must not be confused with immediate convictionAccountability vsOnline JudgmentAccountability is essential in any field particularly one that involves trust mentorship and personal development It requires evidence fairness and a process that allows all parties to be heard It demands careful investigation not assumptionsHowever the digital age has altered how accountability is often pursued Social media platforms while empowering voices that were once unheard can also collapse the distinction between allegation and proof A single claim can quickly evolve into a widely accepted narrative reinforced by repetition rather than verificationFor Indian ashrams and yoga institutions that host international students this dynamic presents unique challenges These environments often operate within cultural frameworks that differ significantly from Western norms Concepts such as discipline hierarchy seva selfless service communal living and traditional teacherstudent relationships may be unfamiliaror even uncomfortableto some participantsCultural differences should never be used to excuse misconduct At the same time they should not be dismissed or misinterpreted without context A fair evaluation must consider both the substance of allegations and the cultural environment in which they ariseYoga Is UniversalBut Its Origins MatterThere is little dispute about where yoga began It originated in India and has evolved over thousands of years through philosophical inquiry spiritual practice and lived traditionUNESCO has recognised yoga as part of Indiarsquos intangible cultural heritage acknowledging its deep roots in Indian society and its transmission through generations of teachers and practitioners The United Nationsrsquo establishment of the International Day of Yoga further reflects its global significanceYoga today belongs to humanity in the sense that anyone can practise it and benefit from it But universality should not come at the cost of historical clarity Recognising yogarsquos Indian origins is not about exclusivityit is about intellectual honesty and cultural respectJust as other global traditions retain acknowledgment of their origins yoga too deserves to be understood within the context from which it emergedThe Yoga Alliance QuestionOne of the clearest examples of the current imbalance is the widespread perception of Yoga Alliance as a global authorityYoga Alliance is a USbased nonprofit organisation that provides voluntary registration for yoga teachers and schools Its certificationssuch as Registered Yoga Teacher RYT and Registered Yoga School RYSare widely recognised particularly in Western marketsHowever it is important to understand what Yoga Alliance is not It is not a governmental body nor is it an international regulatory authority It does not possess legal jurisdiction over yoga worldwideIts role is primarily administrative and commercialoffering a framework for standardised training hours and maintaining directories that help students find registered teachers and schoolsThese services can be useful But they do not determine authenticity depth of knowledge or the legitimacy of a traditionIndian yoga institutions many of which have existed for decades or even centuries developed long before such organisations were established Their authority is rooted in lineage philosophy and lived practicenot in modern registration systemsYet in todayrsquos global marketplace recognition from a foreign organisation is often treated as a benchmark of credibilitysometimes even more so than recognition from Indian bodiesIndiarsquos Own StandardsIndia is not without its own systems of certification and regulation The Yoga Certification Board established by the Ministry of AYUSH provides structured governmentbacked credentials for yoga professionalsThese certifications are designed to assess competence knowledge and experience within a framework that reflects both traditional and contemporary standardsDespite this many Indian yoga schools prioritise registration with Western organisations The reason is largely practical international students travel agencies and employers often recognise Western credentials more readilyThis reveals a deeper issue Commercial visibility is frequently mistaken for cultural legitimacyA certification that is widely marketed or internationally recognised may carry economic advantagesbut it does not necessarily reflect a deeper connection to the tradition itselfFrom Cultural Exchange to Cultural GatekeepingGlobal participation in yoga has brought immense benefits Crosscultural exchange has enriched the practice introduced new perspectives and expanded its reachHowever concerns arise when participation evolves into gatekeepingGatekeeping occurs when organisations outside the tradition begin to exert disproportionate influence over key aspects of yoga includingwho is considered a credible teacherwhat constitutes an acceptable curriculumwhich practices are emphasised or omittedwhich institutions gain visibility or lose itWhen such decisions are influenced by unverified claims public pressure or commercial considerations private organisations risk assuming roles that resemble regulatory authoritywithout the accountability that true regulatory bodies requireThis can have serious consequences Institutions may face reputational damage financial loss or exclusion from global platforms based on incomplete or unverified informationThe Role of Digital NarrativesThe internet has transformed how stories are told and shared It has given individuals the ability to speak out connect with others and challenge powerful institutionsThis is a positive development Many important issues have come to light because of digital platformsAt the same time these platforms are not designed to conduct investigations They prioritise engagement speed and emotional resonance Complex situations are often reduced to simplified narratives where nuance is lostIn such environments allegations can quickly become accepted truths Repetition can create the appearance of consensus even when evidence is limited or contestedThis dynamic does not serve justice Justice requires patience evidence and the willingness to examine multiple perspectivesStrengthening Indian InstitutionsIndian yoga organisations must also reflect on their own responsibilitiesAs yoga continues to attract international participants institutions must adapt to higher expectations of transparency governance and safeguarding Clear policies documented procedures and accessible grievance mechanisms are essentialTraditional values and modern standards are not mutually exclusive In fact they can reinforce each otherStrengthening institutional practices will not only protect students but also enhance the credibility of Indian yoga traditions on the global stageHowever reform should not come at the cost of authority Indian institutions should not feel compelled to relinquish their voice or legitimacy in order to meet external expectationsA Subtle Double StandardThere is also a noticeable difference in how authority is perceivedWestern teachers who adapt yogablending it with fitness psychology or lifestyle coachingare often celebrated as innovators Their reinterpretations are seen as creative and accessibleIn contrast Indian teachers who operate within traditional frameworks may be viewed with suspicion Their adherence to lineage discipline and established practices can be misunderstood as rigidity or even controlThis reflects a subtle but significant bias Authority rooted in tradition is often questioned more readily than authority framed as modern or individualisticRecognising this bias is an important step toward a more balanced understandingToward a More Balanced FrameworkA fair and sustainable global yoga ecosystem requires a more balanced approachone that respects both universality and originSeveral steps can help move in this directionclearly distinguishing between allegations investigations and proven findingsensuring transparent and consistent processes for handling complaintsincluding meaningful representation from Indian scholars and practitioners in global yoga organisationsstrengthening and promoting Indiarsquos own certification systemsencouraging greater transparency and accountability within all institutionsSuch measures would not only improve fairness but also foster trust across culturesThe Core IssueAt its heart the issue is one of balanceThe global yoga industry relies heavily on Indian knowledge philosophy and symbolism It draws from texts traditions and practices that originated in India Yet the authority to define certify and judge yoga is increasingly concentrated outside of itThis creates a contradictionYoga may belong to the worldbut its roots remain firmly in India Respecting those roots means recognising the role of Indian teachers institutions and traditions as centralnot peripheralto its futureGlobal participation should be collaborative not hierarchical It should involve dialogue mutual respect and shared responsibilityAnd above all when questions of conduct or legitimacy arise they must be addressed through principles that apply everywhere evidence fairness and due processnot the shifting tides of online consensus

Who Gets to Define Yoga? The Growing Power Imbalance Between India’s Living Traditions and Western Gatekeepers

Other Articles

Mid-Day Fast

Home / Buzzfeed / Article / Who Gets to Define Yoga? The Growing Power Imbalance Between India’s Living Traditions and Western Gatekeepers

Who Gets to Define Yoga? The Growing Power Imbalance Between India’s Living Traditions and Western Gatekeepers

Other Articles

Mid-Day Fast