Can cricket get shorter than T20? Exploring T60 format, cricketainment trends, and the future of fast-paced cricket
Could T60 Be Cricket’s Next Fast Lane
Cricket, the Gentleman’s Game, has increasingly moved beyond the boundaries of sport to become a full-fledged entertainment spectacle, a phenomenon many fans now casually describe as “cricketainment.” Packed stadiums, prime-time television slots and high-energy franchise leagues have transformed how the game is consumed. As audiences grow more accustomed to shorter, faster sporting content, the question naturally arises: could cricket become even more compressed without losing its appeal?
If history is any guide, the sport has rarely resisted reinvention. Over the past four decades, limited-overs cricket has undergone multiple structural changes, each aimed at making the game quicker and more engaging. The earliest One Day Internationals were played over 60 overs per side. By the late 1980s, the format was trimmed to 50 overs while the early 2000s brought the biggest disruption with the arrival of Twenty20 cricket, a format that reduced the contest to just 20 overs per side and dramatically altered the sport’s tempo. Matches now finish within three hours, encouraging aggressive batting, innovative shot-making and rapid tactical decisions.
Yet the appetite for brevity in modern sport continues to grow. In an era dominated by quick digital consumption, the idea of an even shorter contest -- a hypothetical 60-ball format per side, effectively a 10-over match -- often surfaces in conversations about cricket’s future. Such a format, loosely imagined as The Sixty (T60), would compress the game into roughly an hour, turning it into a rapid-fire sporting event where every delivery carries immediate consequence.
This assumes significance in the wake of the Abu Dhabi T10 Cricket League, recognized by the International Cricket Committee (ICC). Similarly, The Hundred being conceptualized and organized by the England Cricket Board is also one of the examples of the ‘new’ shortest form of the cricket being talked about. Also, some ex-players like Eoin Morgan and Virender Sehwag have been batting for this shorter format.
If becomes a reality, this format would not only integrate speed and time, but also bring elements of comfort, cheer, relaxation and leisure assuring holistic sport happiness.
Former India captain Dilip Vengsarkar, who played during the transition from 60-over to 50-over one-day cricket, believes such a concept would fundamentally alter how the game is approached.
“Cricket has already accelerated massively over the years. If a match ever comes down to just 60 balls per side, every delivery would feel decisive,” he said. According to him, traditional pacing in batting would virtually disappear. “There would be no settling in. Players would have to attack immediately and the margin for error would be minimal,” Vengsarkar adds.
Bowlers, he feels, would also operate under extreme pressure in such a condensed format. “One expensive over could swing the entire match. In a game that short, momentum would shift in seconds.”
Even as such possibilities generate curiosity, experts emphasize that experimentation must coexist with tradition. Vengsarkar believes shorter formats can complement rather than replace the longer versions of the game. “Cricket’s strength is its variety,” he says adding, “Innovation is welcome, but the longer formats must always remain the foundation.”
For now, a T60 contest remains merely a thought experiment, an idea that reflects cricket’s continuing search for balance between sport and spectacle. Yet the sport’s history suggests that whenever audiences embrace speed and excitement, cricket has rarely been reluctant to evolve.
If the concept of a one-hour match ever finds its way from conversation to competition, it could represent the purest expression yet of cricketainment, a format where the drama unfolds at breakneck speed and every ball truly matters.
By Bhalchandra Chorghade
Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!
