Home / News / India News / Article /
Flimsy reasons for strikes like bomb blast in Pakistan irk SC
Updated On: 22 February, 2020 08:22 AM IST | New Delhi | Agencies
The appeal against the high court's verdict came up for hearing before a bench of Justices Arun Mishra and M R Shah on Thursday

Strikes by advocates for "flimsy reasons", like bomb blast in a Pakistan school and earthquake in Nepal, on all working Saturdays for more than past 35 years in three districts of Uttarakhand has caught the attention of the Supreme Court which rapped them. The issue came to the notice of the apex court while it was hearing an appeal against the verdict of the Uttarakhand High Court which had held as "illegal" the strikes or boycotts of court work on all Saturdays by lawyers in Dehradun and in several parts of Haridwar and Udham Singh Nagar.
In its September 25, 2019, verdict, the high court had referred to the 266th report of the Law Commission, which had analysed data on loss of working days on account of strikes by lawyers and had opined that it affects functioning of courts and contributes to the ever mounting pendency of cases. As per information sent by the high court to the Law Commission with respect to Uttarakhand for 2012-2016, advocates were on strike for 455 days during this period in Dehradun district, followed by 515 days in Haridwar district.
How do you like the new new mid-day.com experience? Share your feedback and help us improve.

