Delhi witnesses a major political showdown as the Cockroach Janata Party (CJP) launched its much-publizised 'Chalo Sansad' march, with thousands of students and supporters gathering to march towards Parliament over alleged examination irregularities. The national capital remained on high alert as Delhi Police increased security deployment around Jantar Mantar and key routes. Reports of barricades, roadblocks, security checks and restrictions around multiple metro stations added to the tension as authorities prepared to manage the large gathering. The protest gained further political attention after Chandrashekhar Azad joined the CJP demonstration, adding a new dimension to the ongoing agitation. CJP leaders accused BJP workers and Delhi Police of attempting to provoke unrest during the march, while alleging that authorities were preparing for a crackdown instead of addressing their demands. CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke continued to push demands linked to alleged examination irregularities and criticised the government's response to the protest movement. Wangchuk released a handwritten letter outlining conditions for ending his fast, including demands for accountability over alleged NEET paper leak failures and an appeal to MPs and political leaders to raise the issue in Parliament. WATCH

The protest led by environmental activist Sonam Wangchuk has entered a dramatic new phase after he was forced to shift to Delhi's Safdarjung Hospital on the 21st day of his indefinite hunger strike, triggering fresh political questions over his treatment. Wangchuk, who has been fasting over issues including alleged examination paper leaks and student suicides, was moved from Jantar Mantar after Delhi Police said his deteriorating health required immediate medical attention. The hospitalisation, however, has sparked a fresh controversy after Wangchuk's wife, Gitanjali Angmo, publicly questioned the circumstances surrounding the transfer. She alleged that her husband should not have been hospitalised without consulting his family and claimed she was denied access to medical reports and was not allowed to carry her mobile phone inside the hospital. Angmo has further demanded that no oral or intravenous treatment be administered to Wangchuk without her prior consent and consultation with the family's doctors. Referring to constitutional protections, she cited Article 32 while questioning what she described as "forced treatment" and maintained that Wangchuk was stable before being shifted to the hospital. WATCH