Home / Sunday-mid-day / Article / 'Not Muhammad Mir Khan; it's Shah Jahan'

'Not Muhammad Mir Khan; it's Shah Jahan'

Veteran British art curator Jeremiah P Losty studies a previously unpublished collection of miniature paintings from an Indian textile collector couple and finds rare works that help debunk historical errors.

Listen to this article :
Shah Jahan at the age of about 40; Mughal, 1690u00c3u00a2u00c2u0088u00c2u00921700. PICS COURTESY/Court & Courtship: Indian Miniatures in the TAPI Collection, Niyogi books

Shah Jahan at the age of about 40; Mughal, 1690u00c3u00a2u00c2u0088u00c2u00921700. PICS COURTESY/Court & Courtship: Indian Miniatures in the TAPI Collection, Niyogi books

As a horse instinctively and blindly runs to his stable, our eyes invariably travel to the textile and pattern seen in a work of art—be it the Indus Valley priest dressed in the trefoil pattern garment, or a Chola bronze with a floral meander on the lower garment, or in Mughal, Deccani, Rajasthani or Pahadi miniatures," says veteran collector Shilpa Shah about the love for textiles she shares with husband Praful Shah. "We immediately ask ourselves, 'Could this pattern depict an embroidery? Or is it kalamkari or block print? Does the emperor's striped pyjama in a Mughal painting, represent a mashru?'"

This curiosity for textiles led the Mumbai-based couple to discover miniature paintings, which, Shilpa says, reflect the plethora of textiles used in costumes, and as tents, canopies and floorspreads in pre-colonial and colonial India. This made the paintings perhaps the only literary and visual record that existed prior to the British documenting the textile crafts of India. "It is an invaluable resource for visual evidence of textiles," she adds.

How do you like the new new mid-day.com experience? Share your feedback and help us improve.

Read Next Story
Don't stop moving

Trending Stories

Latest Photoscta-pos

Latest VideosView All

Latest Web StoriesView All

Mid-Day FastView All

Advertisement