Home / Sunday-mid-day / Article / Should Ram have filed a defamation case?

Should Ram have filed a defamation case?

A unique book combines mythology and criminal law, putting characters from the Ramayana under the lens of the IPC, leaving them to defend their actions

Listen to this article :
An artist's depiction of Lakshman stating his arguments on why he cut off Surpanakha's nose. Illustration/Uday Mohite

An artist's depiction of Lakshman stating his arguments on why he cut off Surpanakha's nose. Illustration/Uday Mohite

The burden of an epic is that each succeeding generation will interpret it from the lens of its own morals and viewpoint. In recent years, the Ramayana and Mahabharata have been viewed from several lenses—feminist, Dalit, genocide, and from the perspectives of their traditional antagonists. However, what if one viewed them from their very own lens, i.e. dharma, but not by its ancient definition. Rather, from what it means in 2020?

Journalist Anil Maheshwari and his nephew advocate Vipul Maheshwari have applied perhaps the most modern equivalent of dharma i.e. the Indian Penal Code. And, in the witness box, presenting their case stand is everyone, from Indra, Ahalya and Vishwamitra to Sita, Lakshman and, of course, Ram himself.

Exhibition Ad Banner
Exhibition Ad Banner

How do you like the new new mid-day.com experience? Share your feedback and help us improve.

Read Next Story
Everything you need to know to crack the virtual garba party this year

Trending Stories

Latest Photoscta-pos

Latest VideosView All

Latest Web StoriesView All

Mid-Day FastView All

Advertisement