shot-button
Subscription Subscription
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai News > Article > Mumbai JJ Hospital PIO fined for not giving info on illegality on premises

Mumbai: JJ Hospital PIO fined for not giving info on illegality on premises

Updated on: 10 June,2017 07:16 PM IST  |  Mumbai
Rupsa Chakraborty |

Officer penalised four years after filing of RTI query for not providing information on unauthorised photocopy centre in hospital compound; applicant, who is still waiting for a reply, asks if administration is hand in glove with shop owner

Mumbai: JJ Hospital PIO fined for not giving info on illegality on premises

In June 2014, JJ hospital was served a notice, directing it to provide the information within two months, but it failed to comply. File Pic
In June 2014, JJ hospital was served a notice, directing it to provide the information within two months, but it failed to comply. File Pic


An alleged illegality by a PCO (public call office) on the JJ Hospital premises has put the wrong kind of spotlight on the latter. And delay in furnishing information on the same under the Right To Information (RTI) Act has landed the biggest state-run hospital’s public information officer (PIO) in trouble.


State Information Commissioner Ajit Kumar Jain has fined the PIO, Sanjay Gaigale, for not providing information to a former resident doctor, who had filed an RTI application in 2013.


Gaigale was sent a notice on May 15 and fined Rs 25,000 ( which is to be paid in five instalments) under section 20 (1) of the RTI Act, 2005, for violation of section 7 of the Act.

Case diary
Speaking to mid-day, the doctor, who had filed a query when he was a student at the college on the premises, said, "I had been informed that the PCO within the hospital compound was illegally doubling up as a photocopying centre. The shop owner, without paying the electricity bills, was providing the facility. So, I had filed an RTI application to find out how much had been paid by the shop owner towards electricity."

Gaigale responded that his application had been forwarded to the department concerned, but the doctor never heard anything further on his query. He later filed for a first appeal, but when the hospital didn’t respond, he filed for a second appeal. In response, on June 5, 2014, a notice was served, asking the hospital to provide the information within two months with an explanation. Again, the PIO didn’t respond to the directive.

No sign of info
Gaigale was instructed to provide the information to the applicant by May 31. But the doctor still hasn’t been furnished the same.

"It took four years for the information commissioner to fine the PIO. And the information still hasn’t reached me. Either the hospital is involved or it doesn’t care about the RTI Act," said the applicant.

Dean Dr TP Lahane, however, said, "I am not aware of this... JJ hospital always replies to RTI applicants within stipulated time. We respect the Act and don’t delay response. The officer who was in charge in 2013 has left, so I will have to check."

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!


Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK