shot-button
Subscription Subscription
Home > Mumbai > Mumbai News > Article > Mumbai Residents and trustees fight as 108 year old building crumbles

Mumbai: Residents and trustees fight as 108-year-old building crumbles

Updated on: 08 September,2017 07:43 PM IST  |  Mumbai
Hemal Ashar | hemal@mid-day.com

It's 19 tenants claim that they are ready for redevelopment as the building has become precarious because it is so old, but the trustees "insist on repairs and not on redevelopment."

Mumbai: Residents and trustees fight as 108-year-old building crumbles

This Jaiphal Terrace problem needs a solution
This Jaiphal Terrace problem needs a solution


Jaiphal Terrace, a ground plus two storey 108 year-old building comprising two wings, tucked away at the mouth of Forjett Street, behind Sethna Agiary, has received three MHADA notices citing that it is dangerous. It's 19 tenants claim that they are ready for redevelopment as the building has become precarious because it is so old, but the trustees of the M B Seith Agiary Trust, custodians of the structure, magnificent even in its faded glory, "insist on repairs and not on redevelopment," say frustrated tenants.


Delna Peer and Shahnaz Jehani make their point
Delna Peer and Shahnaz Jehani make their point


Says Nasha Jassawalla, president, Jaiphal Terrace Tenants Association, "The dilly-dallying has gone on for more than eight years. We have had so many meetings with trustee Burjor Mehta. The three-man trustee board simply does not want to budge."

Jassawalla adds, "We found a Parsi redeveloper, with an excellent track record, after the trustee's chosen redeveloper backed out of the project, and we, the tenants were challenged by trustees to find one. Even then, the trustees say, repairs not redevelopment."

Money matters
According to the tenants, the MHADA notice cites, "repairs to the building will cost approximately Rs 1 crore, 15 lakh. MHADA will pay Rs 80 lakh as cess and the rest, Rs 35 lakh have to be borne by the tenants/trustees. The tenants say, "Who repairs a 108 year-old building? We will have to spend repeatedly on repairs. These are also 'blind repairs' suggested by MHADA, which means they address the 'visual' damage to the building. The real damage is internal and once repairs are started, the cost may go up to three times that amount. We, as tenants, see no merit in going down that path."

Raining in the home
Say Delna Peer and Shahnaz Jehani both tenants, "it was practically raining 'inside' some homes in the building; some tenants had placed buckets all over their home as water comes inside." Shahnaz adds, "Tenants have paid heavily for waterproofing on the terrace.

Face off
Tenants claim that the trustees ask them, "There are at least 5,000 buildings, which have been repaired by MHADA in the city. What makes you any different? Our answer: Show us how many are satisfied with those repairs and how long have they lasted?"

All on props
Tenants point to leakage, walls with cracks in them, and props, paid for by tenants, are being used as building supports. The tenants sign off, "The MHADA in a notice said trustees, tenants and the redeveloper meet at their office to talk. On June 21 this year in fact, tenants and trustees were invited by MHADA for a meeting for clarity on repairs or redevelopment. Some lines of the MHADA notice ominously read: 'the building is in very much dilapidated condition...' The last line of the notice read: Please also note that, you will be solely held responsible for any untoward accident, incident, mishap in the building during the period.' The trustees did not come for the meeting," said residents.

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!


Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK