Home / News / India News / Article / The MiDDAY People's Freedom Charter

The MiDDAY People's Freedom Charter

With the MiDDAY People's Freedom Charter, we wish to ensure that draconian and ambiguous laws are no longer part of our legal ecosystem

  • WhatsAppBookmarkBookmark
Listen to this article :

Since its inception in 1979, MiDDAY has stood for and stridently defended free speech principles.u00a0Today, this newspaper takes one more step in defending the citizens’ right to free speech with the MiDDAY People’s Freedom Charter.u00a0It is no secret that governments do not like criticism. It is also no secret that political parties, regardless of their ideology, have opposed the principles of free speech and expression.

The latest instance of two women being arrested in Palghar in Thane district is a case in point, where the city Shiv Sena head complained to the local police when a 21-year-old girl questioned on Facebook as to why an entire city should shut down because Bal Thackeray had died.

The two women were initially booked under Section 295A of the IPC for hurting the religious sentiment of others, and Section 66A of the Information Technology Act which allows arrest of a person who sends, by means of a computer or communication device, information that is grossly offensive or has menacing character.
u00a0
The charges were later changed and the women were charged afresh under Section 505(2) of the IPC, which books people for making, publishing, circulating statement on grounds of religion, caste or community, feelings of enmity, hatred or ill-will.
u00a0
Another misuse of law is the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, which is being used to intimidate the common man to stop criticising anyone, be it the government or otherwise.

Since the interpretation of the section 66A is uncertain, its application is often arbitrary and, in the case of the Palghar women, baseless. The arrest of cartoonist Aseem Trivedi is another case in point. The arrest of a man in Puducherry for tweeting against Karthi Chidambaram, son of Union Finance Minister P u00a0Chidambaram is a third.

The section says: “Punishment for sending offensive messages through communication service, etc. - Any person who sends, by means of a computer resource or a communication device,-(a) any information that is grossly offensive or has menacing character; or (b) any information which he knows to be false, but for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, injury, criminal intimidation, enmity, hatred, or ill will, persistently makes by making use of such computer resource or a communication device, (c) any electronic mail or electronic mail message for the purpose of causing annoyance or inconvenience or to deceive or to mislead the addressee or recipient about the origin of such messages shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and with fine.”

Read Next Story
Slowly but surely liberty is being curbed

Trending Stories

Latest Photoscta-pos

Latest VideosView All

Latest Web StoriesView All

Mid-Day FastView All