Do away with boss-employee arrangement: Ian Chappell to Cricket Australia

Travis Head of Australia A catches the ball as skipper Usman Khawaja looks on during a practice session prior to boycotting the SA tour in Brisbane on Tuesday PicAFPIt appears that the two main objectives of Cricket Australia CA in their increasingly acrimonious dispute with the players is to reduce the amount of money being paid to firstclass cricketers and to split their associationIf thats not the objective then why offer more money to the elite players and at the same time try and do away with the revenue sharing clause in the MOUFirstly the issue of the amount of money paid to firstclass players CA says it wants to reduce this to overcome the shortfall in funds available to the grassroots level of the game Their main concern is to stop the good young athletes choosing other sports attracted by the greater odds of getting a contract and the higher remuneration availableThe CA case doesnt stand close scrutinyIf other sports are more attractive to good young athletes then why would they reduce the money available to Australias firstclass cricketersSurely the lure of earning a lucrative wage is one way of stemming the flow of good athletes to other sports Decent sized rookie contracts in particular and worthwhile money for firstclass cricketers in general is one way of making the decision for young athletes choosing a career path more of a level playing field Then theres the matter of who devised the current system It was the administrators of CA and the state associationsThey introduced the academy system and appointed the numerous coaches who now proliferate in the game It was the need to provide serious cricket opportunities for young players graduating from the academy and the coaches wanting greater access to the firstclass players time that took the game down the path of becoming fully professionalFirstclass players overpaidNow CA is complaining that firstclass players are overpaid There may well be cases where firstclass players are overpaid mdash the same could be said of most businesses CA includedHowever its that same firstclass system that produces players who go on to become elite internationals Its the elite internationals who create the wide interest in the game that produces lucrative media rights deals large crowd attendances and eager sponsors not to mention inspiring youngsters to either become players or followers of the game In essence its the elite players who are responsible for providing administration jobs and in many cases well paid onesThe business of Australian cricket should not be a boss and employee arrangement It has to be a partnership where both sides have a vested interest in growing the game And there has to be a certain amount of trust and respect on both sides for it to work successfully Neither the trust nor the respect is visible at the momentNow that the June 30 deadline for a new MoU has passed and the Australia A invitation to tour South Africa has been declined by the players there are three further events that could cause a deal to be agreed Firstly theres the Channel Nine sponsors lunch next Tuesday in Melbourne Unlike the recent Sydney event there will be CA officials in the room and it could be rather uncomfortable for the attending administrators if a deal isnt imminentThe next period of interest will be the ODI tour to India in October Its highly unlikely CA will want to aggravate the BCCI by cancelling that tour so look for a deal to be in place by then or else the tour is likely to be rescheduledAshes in crisisThen theres the Ashes series This is a highly lucrative tour that creates great interest among the public and usually causes a spike in the playing numbers at junior levelCA wont want to forfeit any of those lucrative Ashes opportunities and I also cant imagine them just handing the series to England on a platter by choosing a substandard team If CA doesnt have a deal in place before the commencement of the Ashes series then Donald Trumps wont be the only leadership style I find mystifying