Tuesday's World Cup match has plenty of significance for both sides, with emerging nation Afghanistan still in contention for a semi-final place after winning four of their seven pool matches so far during the tournament
There have been boycotts and walkovers at previous World Cups, with both Australia and the West Indies forfeiting matches in Sri Lanka (Pic: AFP)
Australia star Steve Smith said the decision to let the team play Afghanistan in a crunch ICC World Cup 2023 league stage clash was 'above my pay-grade' as Cricket Australia faced accusations of 'double-standards'.
Earlier this year, CA scrapped a three-match one-day international series against Afghanistan on the grounds the Taliban, who regained power in 2021, had placed fresh limits on education and work opportunities for Afghan women and girls, including female cricketers.
ADVERTISEMENT
In the run-up to Tuesday's high-stakes match in Mumbai, Afghanistan fast bowler Naveen-ul-Haq took to social media to suggest there was an element of hypocrisy in CA abandoning the one-day games but going ahead with a World Cup match where it had something to lose.
"Refusing to play the bilateral series, now it will be interesting to see cricket Australia stand in the World Cup #standards #human rights or 2 points," Naveen wrote on Instagram.
Also Read: Fortune favours the ‘Blue’
Former Australia captain Smith, however, told a pre-match press conference at Mumbai's Wankhede Stadium on Monday: "We obviously played against Afghanistan in the T20 World Cup at home recently and we're playing tomorrow (Tuesday) so it's not a question for me, it's far above my pay grade."
Cricket Australia had earlier responded to Naveen's post, with a spokesperson telling News Corp Australia: "CA made the decision not to proceed with the three match ODI series against Afghanistan in March following the announcement by the Taliban of further restrictions on women's rights including education and employment opportunities and the access to parks and gymnasiums.
"There is a distinction between playing bilateral series against Afghanistan which falls under CA control as compared to playing in a World Cup tournament which is an ICC (International Cricket Council) event and subject to their regulations."
Also Read: The real King in our midst
Tuesday's World Cup match has plenty of significance for both sides, with emerging nation Afghanistan still in contention for a semi-final place after winning four of their seven pool matches so far during the tournament. Afghanistan captain Hashmatullah Shahidi said he had no interest in looking back ahead of such an important fixture.
"I think right now we have a game tomorrow in the World Cup. If we focus on that, instead of these things (CA's position on Afghanistan), it will be better," Shahidi told reporters at the Wankhede later Monday. Meanwhile, five-time champions Australia still need to win one of their final two group games, against Afghanistan and Bangladesh, to secure a place in the knockout stage.
There have been boycotts and walkovers at previous World Cups, with both Australia and the West Indies forfeiting matches in Sri Lanka during the 1996 edition on security grounds. England also refused to play a match against 2003 co-hosts Zimbabwe, citing safety concerns, with the lost points contributing to their early exit from that edition.
(With inputs from agencies)
Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!
