As all the three judges of the Bench couldn't reach to a consensus, the verdict was ruled in the best interest of people of the nation The Allahabad High Court might have succeeded in resolving the legal dispute on Ramjanmabhoomi-Babri Masjid matter, but they differed on many issues particularly on the character of the building that was demolished on December 6, 1992. Two judges of the Bench declared the disputed structure as a mosque, while the third judge said it couldn't be called a mosque as it built was against the tenets of Islam. While Justice S U Khan and Justice Sudhir Agarwal were of the opinion that the disputed structure was a mosque, Justice D V Sharma ruled that it was built against the tenets of Islam and cannot have the character of a mosque. <img alt="" src="/imagedata/2010/oct/ayodhya.jpg" border="5" /> The three-judge Bench gave their verdicts in the Ramjanmabhoomi Babri Masjid dispute ruling by a 2-1 majority Justice Khan held that the disputed structure was constructed as mosque by or under orders of Mughal Emperor Babar. "Disputed structure was always treated, considered and believed to be a mosque and practiced by Mohammedans for worship accordingly. However, it has not even proved that it was built during the reign of Babar in 1528," Justice Agarwal said adding that it was difficult to hold as to when and by whom the structure was constructed. Justice Sharma was of the opinion that the disputed building was constructed by Babar, the year is not certain but it was built against the tenets of Islam and hence it cannot have the character of a mosque. The three-judge Bench yesterday gave their verdicts in the sixty-year-old legal Ramjanmabhoomi Babri Masjid dispute ruling by a 2-1 majority that disputed land in Ayodhya be divided into three parts among Hindus and Muslims. Farewell Ruling Justice Dharam Veer Sharma, one of the three judges who gave their verdict in the 60-year-old Ayodhya title dispute, demitted office yesterday. Justice Sharma, who arrived at the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court in the afternoon, was given a warm farewell by members of the Oudh Bar Association at a small functionu00a0 in the evening. Earlier, judges led by Chief Justice of the Allahabad High Court FI Rebello, wished him good luck for the future at a brief function at the Judges Club.

As all the three judges of the Bench couldn't reach to a consensus, the verdict was ruled in the best interest of people of the nation

Difference of opinion led to united India

Trending Stories

Latest Photos

Latest Videos

Latest Web Stories

Ganeshotsav 2026

Home / News / India News / Article / Difference of opinion led to united India

Difference of opinion led to united India

Trending Stories

Latest Photos

Latest Videos

Latest Web Stories

Ganeshotsav 2026