A Mumbai sessions court today held that the offence of &#39;culpable homicide not amounting to murder&#39; under IPC had been made out against Bollywood actor Salman Khan in a 2002 hit-and-run case and rejected his appeal challenging a Magistrate&#39;s order invoking this charge. Dictating the order in an open court, Sessions Judge U B Hejib ruled that Salman would face the charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Under the provision, the actor might be awarded ten years imprisonment and is triable by a sessions court. <img alt="Salman Khan" src="http://images.mid-day.com/2013/jan/Slaman-Khan-1.jpg" style="width: 500px; height: 624px;" /> Salman Khan Salman was earlier tried by a magistrate under the lesser charge of causing death by negligence (Section 304 A of IPC), which provides for a maximum punishment of two years in jail. However, in a twist to the case, the Bandra Metropolitan Magistrate, after examining 17 witnesses, had brought forth the more serious charge of culpable homicide against the 47-year-old actor and transferred it to a sessions court for re-trial. Advancing his argument against invoking the grave charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder (section 304 part II IPC), his counsel Ashok Mundargi pleaded that the Magistrate&#39;s order was &quot;erroneous, bad in law and contrary to evidence on record.&quot; The Magistrate, he contended, had failed to appreciate that the actor had neither the intention to kill people, nor the knowledge that his rash and negligent driving would kill a person and cause injury to four others. Public Prosecutor Shankar Erande while opposing Salman&#39;s appeal said the Magistrate had rightly invoked the charge of culpable homicide as he had committed a serious offence. The court fixed July 19 for commencement of the retrial. Erande argued that a prosecution witness Ravindra Patil (now deceased), a police bodyguard deployed for the actor&#39;s security and accompanying him at the time of the accident, had warned him not to drive rashly as it could lead to a mishap. Yet, Khan did not pay heed and drove at a great speed, the prosecutor contended. The prosecutor submitted that Khan was drunk and his blood sample revealed 60 mg alcohol which was beyond the permissible limit. He said Salman had the knowledge that his act of rash driving, more particularly after taking drinks, might result in death of people in accident. Moreover, the actor is familiar with the topography of the area as he stays close to the scene of the accident. As such, he was fully aware that people sleep on the footpaths in that locality, the prosecutor said. One person was killed and four others were injured when the Land Cruiser allegedly driven by Khan ran into a group of people sleeping on the pavement outside a bakery in suburban Bandra in the wee hours on September 28, 2002.

In a major setback to Bollywood superstar Salman Khan, a Mumbai court Monday rejected his review plea challenging a magistrate's order for a re-trial in the 2002 hit-and-run case under the stringent charge of culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

2002 hit-and-run case: Salman Khan to be tried for culpable homicide

Trending Stories

Latest Photos

Latest Videos

Latest Web Stories

Ganeshotsav 2026

Home / News / India News / Article / 2002 hit-and-run case: Salman Khan to be tried for culpable homicide

2002 hit-and-run case: Salman Khan to be tried for culpable homicide

Trending Stories

Latest Photos

Latest Videos

Latest Web Stories

Ganeshotsav 2026