Continued from page 01 INGALE had moved a contempt of court proceeding in June 2019 at the HC against the Satara collector and state revenue secretary for not providing him a parcel of land as per a Government Resolution ( GR) of 1971.
A division bench of Justice K K Tated and Sarang Kotwal heard the matter where it was requested that Ingaleu2019s widow Mantabai, be allowed to continue with the contempt proceeding as a beneficiary. The HC has given the state and Satara Collector two weeks to respond.
The case Ingale breathed his last on August 25, 2019 at the age of 74 at his home in Hingnole village, Satara district. He had served as a driver in the 1971 Indo- Pak war and had been fighting to secure a small piece of land promised under the 1971 GR. The HC had found Ingale eligible for agricultural land and a plot for a house and had directed the state to hand it to him in its February 2018 verdict on Ingaleu2019s writ petition filed in April 2015.
u201c When I am being made to run from courts to government offices despite being a war- injured soldier, who had fought enemies in the 1971 war, what will the government do for my wife after my demise?u201d Hindurao Ingale had said in June 2019.
u201c Two days before his death, he was telling me that he was worried about me. I ignored him, but today when he is no more, and with no source of income and two jobless, drunkard sons, I am lonely and clueless,u201d Mantabai, Hinduraou2019s wife, had told mid- day soon after his demise.
u201c My husband was a soldier who sustained bullet injuries for the country.
After four- and- a- half decades of fighting, the Bombay High Court passed an order in our favour but the state machinery ensured that we never got justice,u201d Mantabai had said.
Advocate Rajeshwar Panchal, who is appearing pro- bono for the family, said, u201c Considering the benefits to which Ingale was entitled under the GR, the court prima facie was of the view that there was no compliance of the February 27, 2018, order by the Satara Collector and the state government.
The GR clearly mandates allotment of either five acres of irrigated land or 10 acres of non- irrigated land.u201d The Satara Collector had allotted him five acres of non- irrigated land which Ingale had refused to accept as the ground reality was different from what he was told. Apart from being non- irrigated, the land was also disputed.
Moreover, the Collector failed to allot another three guntas for a house.
u201c Our contempt plea has been accepted by the HC and the Assistant Government Pleader ( AGP), who represented the Respondent ( collector, Satara and state government), has been asked to file an affidavit. The AGP told the HC that the 2018 order has been complied with, which I objected to as an utter lie. The court then asked for an affidavit. The matter will be heard on February 28 next.u201d The contempt plea Panchal has stated that Ingale is entitled to four hectares of dry crop or jirayat land, or two hectares of seasonally- irrigated or paddy land, or one hectare of perennially- irrigated or bagayat land and a residential plot admeasuring up to 300 square metre.
Ingale had requested for land in districts adjoining his own, such as Pune Rural, Ahmednagar or Nashik as the GR did not mention granting land in the district of the soldieru2019s residence.
Wife to continue husbandu2019s fight Bombay High Court allowed Mantabai Ingale, being her husbandu2019s beneficiary, to continue with the contempt proceedings Hindurao Ingale with his wife and family at his home in Satara. FILE PICS u2018 Our contempt plea has been accepted by the HC and the Assistant Government Pleader ( AGP), who represented the Respondent ( Collector Satara and state government), has been asked to file an affidavit. The AGP told the HC that the 2018 order has been complied with, which I objected to as an utter lie. The court then asked for an affidavitu2019 Rajeshwar Panchal, advocate APRIL 2015 When Hindurao Ingale filed a writ petition for land FEBRUARY 28 Day of next hearing
