12 October,2026 11:18 AM IST | Mumbai | mid-day online correspondent
NCP (SP) leader Rohit Pawar staging a protest against the MPSC (File pic)
Following the action taken by the Maharashtra Government on the MPSC Chairman, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Monday raised questions over the recent MPSC student protests.
BJP asked whether the movement was truly meant to address student grievances or served as a launchpad for NCP (SP) MLA Rohit Pawar's political ambitions.
As per IANS, BJP MLA Vikram Pachpute, who was instrumental in organising a meeting of agitating MPSC aspirants with Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis to find a way out, expressed gratitude to the CM for addressing student concerns with sensitivity and holding discussions with student representatives for the fourth time to find a constructive solution.
However, the BJP MLA also challenged Rohit Pawar to clarify what the students ultimately gained from the protests and who benefited politically.
Addressing the core of the controversy, Pachpute also highlighted that while CM Fadnavis accepted most student demands on September 30, the demand for the resignation of the MPSC chairperson did not fall directly under the state government's jurisdiction.
He said, "If the Chief Minister had the direct authority to dismiss the Chairman, he would have taken appropriate action much earlier. Even though there are constitutional limitations, Rohit Pawar insisted on continuing the protest," as per IANS.
He questioned the rationale behind keeping the agitation alive after the primary demands had already been met, noting that a clear divide eventually emerged between genuine students and political activists participating in the movement.
Referring to the legal and institutional aspects, Pachpute explained that state governments do not have the direct power to remove the chairperson of a constitutional body like the MPSC, as it requires a specific procedure under Article 317 of the Constitution.
He said, "The government adopted a constitutional approach. Once the judicial inquiry process began, the chairperson went on leave. Had a positive approach towards the inquiry process been accepted on September 30 itself, the subsequent conflict could have been avoided, eliminating the need for such a massive uproar," as per IANS.
Pachpute also accused certain political figures of attempting to sensationalise the issue by inviting various politicians, influential personalities, and artists to the protest platform.
He alleged that the focus shifted from solving student problems to gaining personal publicity and political mileage.
To illustrate his point on misplaced priorities, Pachpute offered a cautionary analogy for students, warning them not to get distracted by political agendas at the expense of their careers and studies.
He asked, "Students prepare and struggle to become officers through competitive exams, not to serve as stepping stones for political leaders," he asserted. "Rohit Pawar must now give a straightforward answer -- what did the students actually get from this protest, and who reaped the political benefits?" as per IANS.
(With inputs from IANS)
