15 August,2026 02:21 PM IST | New Delhi | mid-day online correspondent
File Photo
The Tata Sons annual general meeting (AGM), scheduled for August 18, may not take place after the Sir Ratan Tata Trust (SRTT), a key shareholder in the holding company of the Tata Group, was unable to nominate a representative because of a regulatory restriction imposed by Maharashtra's Charity Commissioner, people familiar with the matter said.
The meeting is scheduled to consider several matters, including the directorship of Tata Sons Chairman N Chandrasekaran, who has decided not to seek another term when his current tenure ends in February 2027.
Tata Sons has not communicated any change in the scheduled AGM date to shareholders, the people said. Latest indications are that the company plans to proceed with the meeting but could adjourn it if the required quorum is not achieved.
The issue stems from SRTT's inability to hold a board meeting following an order issued by the Maharashtra Charity Commissioner in May pending an inquiry into the composition of its board.
SRTT holds a 23.56 per cent stake in Tata Sons. Without a board meeting, it cannot jointly nominate a representative with the Sir Dorabji Tata Trust (SDTT), a step required under Tata Sons' Articles of Association for the AGM quorum.
SDTT holds a 27.98 per cent stake in Tata Sons.
Article 86 of Tata Sons' Articles of Association requires at least five members to be personally present at the AGM, including a representative jointly nominated by SRTT and SDTT as long as the two trusts together hold at least 40 per cent of Tata Sons.
The two trusts collectively hold about 66 per cent of the company, making the provision applicable. The Shapoorji Pallonji family owns about 18.37 per cent of Tata Sons.
"As of today, they (SRTT) don't have permission from the Charity Commissioner to hold a board meeting of SRTT. If SRTT cannot hold a board meeting, they cannot jointly nominate people to attend the AGM, which is a requirement for quorum. When the quorum is not there, they cannot hold the AGM as it stands today," a person with direct knowledge of the development told PTI.
The regulatory impasse dates back to May, when the Charity Commissioner directed SRTT to defer a proposed trustee meeting and ordered an inquiry into alleged non-compliance with Section 30A(2) of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act.
The provision, introduced through a 2025 amendment, limits perpetual or lifetime trustees to not more than 25 per cent of a public trust's board.
A petition seeking the Charity Commissioner's intervention over SRTT's alleged violation of the provision stated that SRTT had six trustees, of whom three -- Jimmy Naval Tata, Jehangir HC Jehangir and Noel Naval Tata -- were lifetime trustees. They therefore constituted 50 per cent of the board, exceeding the statutory ceiling of 25 per cent.
Tata Trusts, however, has argued that the amendment is prospective and does not apply to perpetual trustee appointments made before it came into force on September 1, 2025. It has also described the Charity Commissioner's May direction as having been issued ex parte.
Earlier this week, Tata Trusts vice-chairman Vijay Singh stepped down as a trustee of SRTT, which owns about 23.6 per cent of Tata Sons, and decided not to seek a renewal after his term expired on August 14.
Despite the uncertainty surrounding the AGM, Tata Sons has not yet communicated any possible change or postponement of the meeting to its shareholders.
"What they have done is circulated the meeting date for August 18, but they have not sent any revised date or a recalculation of when it will happen to the shareholders," a source told PTI.
The uncertainty over the AGM comes at a sensitive time for Tata Sons. The company's board has already postponed a decision on Chandrasekaran's reappointment. Tata Trusts have also begun the process of setting up a selection panel to recommend his successor after he decided not to seek another term.
The earliest way forward for the AGM could involve the lifetime trustees of SRTT relinquishing their positions and being reappointed as trustees with fixed tenures in accordance with the amended Section 30A(2) of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, a person with direct knowledge said.
The section restricts perpetual or lifetime trustees on a trust to a maximum of 25 per cent of the overall board strength.
A resolution of the SRTT governance issue could therefore provide a route towards resolving the AGM impasse.
If the August 18 AGM fails to meet the quorum requirement and is adjourned, Chandrasekaran would remain a director until a legally valid AGM is held, according to people familiar with the matter.
(With inputs from PTI)
