By combining the experience of self-reported positive and negative emotions among 1,400 US-residents, researchers created four affective profiles, which they then used to discern differences in happiness, depression, life satisfaction and happiness-increasing strategies.
The study, titled “The affective profiles in the USA: happiness, depression, life satisfaction, and happiness-increasing strategies”, targets some of the important aspects of mental health that represent positive measures of well-being.
Happiness, for example, can be usefully understood as the opposite of depression.
Life satisfaction, another positive measure of well being, refers instead to a comparison process in which individuals assess the quality of their lives on the basis of their own self-imposed standards.
As people adopt strategies to increase their overall well-being, it is important to know which ones are capable of having a positive influence.
“We examined 8 ‘happiness-increasing’ strategies which were first identified by Tkach & Lyubomirsky in 2006”, Danilo Garcia from the University of Gothenburg and the researcher leading the investigation, said.
“These were Social Affiliation (for example, Support and encourage friends), Partying and Clubbing (for example, Drink alcohol), Mental Control (for example, Try not to think about being unhappy), Instrumental Goal Pursuit (for example, Study), Passive Leisure (for example, Surf the internet), Active Leisure (for example, Exercise), Religion (for example, Seek support from faith) and Direct Attempts (for example, Act happy and smile),” Garcia said.
The researchers found that individuals with different affective profiles did indeed differ in the positive measures of well-being and all 8 strategies being studied. For example, individuals classified as self-fulfilling (high positive affect, low negative affect) were the ones who showed lower levels of depression, tended to be happier, and were more satisfied with their lives.
The research is published in the journal PeerJ.