10 September,2026 11:35 AM IST | Mumbai | mid-day online correspondent
File pic
The Maharashtra Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) has declared a religious structure near Terminal 2 of Mumbai's Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport unauthorised, after finding that it did not have the required planning permissions.
The development has triggered a fresh controversy over structures and alleged encroachments near sensitive airport premises. Former BJP MP Kirit Somaiya has demanded immediate demolition of the structure and criminal action against those allegedly responsible for its construction.
Following complaints about unauthorised construction near airport land, MMRDA conducted a verification and found that no official approvals, building sanctions or other statutory permissions had been granted for the structure.
MMRDA has issued formal notices to Mumbai International Airport Limited (MIAL), directing the agency to remove and demolish the unauthorised structure.
The authority has stressed the need to keep the area surrounding the high-security airport zone clear. The structure is located close to critical airport infrastructure, including areas used by VIP movements, taxi parking and terminal facilities.
Officials have raised concerns that unregulated construction in such locations could create security and operational challenges around the international airport.
Somaiya has called for action beyond the physical removal of the structure. He has asked MMRDA and MIAL to register a First Information Report against the managing trustees and other individuals allegedly associated with the construction.
Somaiya has described the alleged attempt at unauthorised land occupation as "Land Jihad", while demanding that the authorities identify and take action against those responsible.
The controversy comes amid wider scrutiny of alleged encroachments around critical national infrastructure. Airport-adjacent areas are subject to security and planning restrictions because of their proximity to sensitive facilities and high-traffic zones.
MIAL and local police authorities are currently examining the directives issued by MMRDA and the arrangements required for carrying out the clearance operation.
Authorities are expected to coordinate security measures before the structure is removed.
The matter also comes against the backdrop of judicial observations emphasising public safety and security around international hubs. The focus remains on ensuring that structures in restricted or sensitive areas comply with applicable planning and administrative requirements.
The authorities' next steps are expected to include the execution of MMRDA's demolition directive and consideration of the request for criminal action.
(With inputs from IANS)
