State units agree with Rohit Sharma's "hunger" comment

Indian skipper Rohit Sharma during a press conference (Pic: AFP)

Indian skipper Rohit Sharma's statement that test opportunities should be provided to those who show hunger for the format found resonance with state associations grappling with youngsters desperate to make a name in white-ball cricket but reluctant to grind it out in first-class games.

The arrival of the cash-rich league (IPL) gave rise to the debate between club vs country for years now. The skipper's statement came when two established names of Indian cricket Shreyas Iyer and Ishan Kishan ignored the order by BCCI to play Ranji Trophy quarterfinals instead of focusing on the Indian Premier League's preparations.

Also Read: Virat Kohli was seen spending quality time with daughter Vamika in London

"Jin logon ko bhookh hai, hum unhi logon ko mauka denge (We will give opportunities to only those who are hungry)," the Indian skipper Sharma stated after securing the series win against England after the fourth test match.

"Agar hunger nahi hai to unko khila ke koi matlab nahi hai (There's no point in playing those who don't have the hunger)," he said.

The hunger that Rohit spoke was seen in young players like Yashasvi Jaiswal, Dhruv Jurel, Sarfaraz Khan, Akash Deep and Shubman Gill. All individuals delivered at deifferent stages of the series against the English men.

But Rohit did make a point about the unnamed ones who don't seem to have that fire in the belly. "I concur with the Indian captain. There should be hunger in younger cricketers to play the longest format," Abhilash Khandekar, president of Madhya Pradesh Cricket Association, told PTI.

It is for those that the BCCI issued a directive earlier this month asking centrally-contracted cricketers to be available for Ranji engagements.

Several officials from state associations agreed with the statement of Rohit Sharma that those who are not up for it should not be considered for the toughest format of the game. But they also feel that a system needs to be in place so that such a situation never arises.

"Ranji Trophy cannot be taken lightly by any player, it is the backbone of Indian cricket. It is the most important tournament in domestic cricket. This should be followed up in other formats in domestic cricket," Khandekar said.

Another official, who did not wish to be named, went to the extent of saying that Ranji Trophy ran the risk of "a slow death if it was not made mandatory for top players to compete."

State units see the parent body's move as a case of better late than never. "I complement BCCI for this decision of compelling players to play for their state in Ranji Trophy. I see it as a case of better late than never, this is going to help domestic cricket in a big way," said Khandekar.

Previously, the Indian batsmen were seen struggling against spin bowling. Former Indian captain Dilip Vengsarkar believes that is the players play for their respective states in Ranji Trophy, it would only benefit them to be good players of spin.

"Playing Ranji is very important. It helps you play spin better on Indian wickets, your overall skills are improved. And when you play foreign teams, it becomes easier (to face spin)," said Vengsarkar, himself a great player of spin.

"I feel it is a player's wish whether to play Ranji or not. If he doesn't want to play, we have enough in India to choose from, they will play and establish themselves. No one is bigger than the game. No one is indispensable," he said.

India's wicketkeeper-batsman Dhruv Jurel made the most out of Ishan Kishan's absence. He played two crucial under -pressure knocks for the side.

Like the MPCA chief, a state unit official proposed another step to rein in players who ignore red-ball cricket. "This was a much needed step and should have been taken earlier. If an India player is regularly featuring in Ranji Trophy, it acts a massive motivator to the younger players in the squad.

"I would also want the BCCI to empower state units to ban those players who don't play Ranji Trophy. If a senior is dropped for once, the juniors would not dare to ignore their red ball commitments for T20 cricket," said a state unit official requesting anonymity.

(With PTI Inputs)