shot-button
Subscription Subscription
Home > News > India News > Article > SC refuses PIL seeking nullification of election of those chargesheeted

SC refuses PIL seeking nullification of election of those chargesheeted

Updated on: 16 November,2020 10:10 PM IST  |  New Delhi
IANS |

The bench emphasised that these are legislative issues, which are within the exclusive domain of Parliament and told the petitioner to pursue remedies for implementation of this judgement

SC refuses PIL seeking nullification of election of those chargesheeted

Supreme Court. File pic

The Supreme Court on Monday declined to entertain a PIL seeking to declare 'null & void' elections of those chargesheeted and facing a minimum of 5 years in jail under the charges.

A bench headed by Justice L.N. Rao and comprising Justices Hemant Gupta and Ajay Rastogi cited the apex court verdict in 2018, which left it on the Parliament to make laws to ensure that people with pending criminal cases do not get into the political arena.

The bench emphasised that these are legislative issues, which are within the exclusive domain of Parliament and told the petitioner to pursue remedies for implementation of this judgement.

In September 2018, a five-judge Constitution bench had described criminalisation of politics as a termite for the citadel of democracy.

The observation from the bench came on a plea filed by NGO Lok Prahari, which submitted the election of persons facing criminal charges is contrary to rule of law. The petitioner emphasised that it runs contrary to the resolve of the Constitution, which is justice to all, and the issues highlighted in the plea were not the same before the bench which delivered the 2018 verdict. The petitioner also brought court's attention on the section 100 of the Representation of the People (RP) Act, which deals with grounds for declaring election to be void.

The bench replied that these grounds are in context of an election petition and only the Parliament can take up this issue, as prayer in the petition seeking amendment to the Act, could be done though the Parliament.

The top court heard the petitioner for close to 40 minutes. "We do not think we can help you. We will not interfere. But we will give you the liberty to pursue your other remedies as per the directions of the Constitution bench judgment", the bench told the petitioner's counsel.


Keep scrolling to read more news


Catch up on all the latest Crime, National, International and Hatke news here. Also download the new mid-day Android and iOS apps to get latest updates.


Mid-Day is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@middayinfomedialtd) and stay updated with the latest news

This story has been sourced from a third party syndicated feed, agencies. Mid-day accepts no responsibility or liability for its dependability, trustworthiness, reliability and data of the text. Mid-day management/mid-day.com reserves the sole right to alter, delete or remove (without notice) the content in its absolute discretion for any reason whatsoever

"Exciting news! Mid-day is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!


Mid-Day Web Stories

Mid-Day Web Stories

This website uses cookie or similar technologies, to enhance your browsing experience and provide personalised recommendations. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. OK