For years, Maharashtra had been held up as a model in governance, but the recent chaos during local polls and displays of defiance by Mahayuti constituents has seen it rapidly devolve into ‘Jungle Raj’
Screengrab of the viral video of MLA Nilesh Rane pointing to the bag of cash that he alleges BJP used to sway voters in Malvan
Like it or not, local body elections in Maharashtra make one feel like the state is drifting toward some kind of “Jungle Raj”. The warning signs are too loud to ignore, even if some political parties or leaders might pretend otherwise.
A state once held up as a model in governance is now being compared to Bihar and not in a good way. The cash, chaos, and controversy in the recent local body polls have earned Maharashtra a dubious distinction.
Things are so bad that a woman candidate needed police protection just to file her nomination papers. She walked in with nearly half-a-dozen armed guards to complete the basic nomination filing procedures. Another candidate required a security squad to simply submit a form for a process that ideally should have been a routine one. This scene looked less like Maharashtra and reminded many of Bihar.
In some interior areas of Maharashtra, polling booths resembled battlefields with scenes like armed guards flanking candidates and shouting party workers blocking entrances.
At times it felt less like an election about “Roti, kapda, makaan and basic civic needs” and more like a scene from “Gangs of Wasseypur” — chaos everywhere and everyone fighting to prove they are the one in charge.
This contrast hurts because for years, Maharashtra was seen as a progressive and forward-looking state known for cooperative movements, industry and stable government. The state was always referred to as No. 1 and a role model for others.
Elections here were usually smooth and predictable. But, many people feel the situation has slipped badly. The comparison with Bihar is stark. Last month, polling in that state was relatively peaceful with no deaths, re-polling, or reports of major violence. Meanwhile, Maharashtra’s local body elections kept making headlines for all the wrong reasons.
And the chaos did not stop after voting. After EVMs were shifted to the strong room, political party workers in some areas were seen creating a ruckus near the storage facilities meant to secure the machine until December 21, the vote counting day.
There were even complaints about attempts at bogus voting, though it was foiled in time. Likewise, allegations of cash being found before and even on the polling day, fights near booths and even one furious voter smashing an EVM were reported from ground zero.
The situation worsened with a last-minute decision to defer polling in some areas from December 2 to December 20, with counting for all local elections to be postponed to December 21.
Adding to the chaos was the Eknath Shinde-led Shiv Sena, a key ally in the so-called “Triple Engine Sarkar”. As per media reports, one Shinde camp MLA was accused of violating the election code of conduct. Another Shinde Sena MLA openly accused BJP of using money power. So was the case with the BJP and Ajit Pawar-led NCP workers. In many areas Mahayuti leaders and workers were seen blaming each other.
On their own, each incident might look like a minor Election Day problem. Taken together, these incidents point to deeper problems in the system and society. Clearly it is telling a much more worrying story.
Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, too, acknowledged that these incidents reflected a failure of the system, a rare and serious admission of how badly things have slipped.
The mood on the ground and the outcome of the latest elections has only strengthened the feeling that when it comes to peaceful elections, nowadays Bihar is a better place than Maharashtra.
Local body elections are often seen as mini assembly polls. The entire unfolding of events reveals the state’s underlying political currents and hints at where governance is actually progressing.
The ongoing situation also brings back memories of a time when the officers and ministers prioritised discipline and reputation over short-term gains. Personalities like Julio Riberio in the police department, TN Seshan in the Election Commission and ministers (former chief minister) like Yeshwantrao Chavan stood out for their uncompromising commitment to rules and integrity. Unfortunately, today, society lacks such officials and politicians.
But, for this deteriorating situation one party alone cannot be blamed. Both ruling and Opposition share responsibility. Over the years, weak alliances, coalition with parties of contrast ideology and lack of accountability has contributed to the current unhealthy situation in the state.
In fact, instead of fierce battle and rebuttals, the Opposition lowering the guard was the primary reason that infighting was seen within the allies, Shinde-led Shiv Sena, BJP and Ajit Pawar’s NCP.
Before we talk about building smart cities, the first priority should be to set our own house in order. Clean up local governance, ensure transparency and strengthen civic systems.
Smart cities are not just about technology, infrastructure, they require free and fair democratic process and more importantly accountable leadership. Only then can dreams of smart cities move beyond slogans to real progress.
Democracy needs ballots and rules, not muscle and mayhem
And, Maharashtra can no longer afford to treat these warning signs lightly. The state’s democracy and institutions deserve urgent attention before the next election cycle. After all, the worry is not just about one election or few incidents of law and order issues, it’s about the future of democracy and more of Maharashtra regaining its tag of peaceful, forward looking role model state.
Sanjeev Shivadekar is political editor, mid-day. He tweets @SanjeevShivadek
Send your feedback to mailbag@mid-day.com
The views expressed in this column are the individual’s and don’t represent those of the paper
Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest news!" Click here!
