Supreme Court quashes FIR against Elvish Yadav in snake venom case

Elvish Yadav. File Pic

Supreme Court has quashed FIR against YouTuber and Big Boss OTT winner Elvish Yadav that was registered in connection with an alleged smuggling and consumption of snake venom, reported the ANI.

A bench of Justices MM Sundresh and N. Kotiswar Singh found procedural lapses in the manner in which the complaint and FIR were filed and noted that the same cannot be sustained in law.

"The complaint and the FIR cannot be sustained in law. We are not going into other issues raised. The Proceedings stands quashed," the Court noted.

Allahabad HC dismisses Yadav's plea, case now before Supreme Court

According to ANI, Yadav approached the Supreme Court seeking the quashing of the chargesheet filed against him and the summons issued in the case.

In May last year, the Allahabad High Court had dismissed his plea, observing that the allegations warranted a thorough legal examination as multiple FIRs had been registered in the matter.

For reference, Elvish Yadav was chargesheeted under Sections 9, 39, 48A, 49, 50 and 51 of the Wildlife Protection Act and Sections 284, 289 and 120B of the IPC and Sections 8, 22, 29, 30 and 32 of the NDPS Act in the FIR lodged at Police Station Sector-49, Noida, District Gautam Buddh Nagar.

Elvish claims no recovery made, challenges chargesheet in court

A summons order was also issued by the First Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gautam Buddh Nagar. Yadav challenged the chargesheet and the proceedings on the ground that the informant was not a competent person to lodge an FIR under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972.

It was pleaded that no snake, narcotic or psychotropic substance has been recovered from the applicant, reported by ANI.

Further, it was pleaded that, "It is a well-known fact that the applicant is an influential person and appears on several reality shows on television, and inevitably, the involvement of the applicant in the instant FIR attracted great attention from the media. Consequently, influenced by the aforesaid attention, the police officers attempted to make the case more sensitive by invoking Sections 27 and 27A of the NDPS Act immediately after arresting the applicant."

(Inputs from ANI)